This is a season of manifestos and economic manifesto becomes really important for both policymakers and the public. I want to raise a couple of questions which can be taken up for public debate. We are headed towards a new government formation. All political parties will try to find a way to introduce their manifesto, which will kick off the process of garnering votes from the people. There are many things that should be in all parties’ manifesto. Economic growth and per capita income are very important issues in this regard.
This is an important but a difficult task to achieve, i.e., to get different political parties on the same plank and form a manifesto on similar issues. There are three questions that can be raised. First is the need of macroeconomic stability. The progress of the government is decided by macroeconomic stability achieved through the FRBM Act. It’s a big achievement but is it possible that we are going to lose that progress?
As part of the finance commission, I have been visiting different states in the country. I can say that since the last one year, the feeling in the states about fiscal deficit and debt-to-GDP target being important has mellowed. It is because there are fears about it not being followed at the central level too. Finance Commission has a big task to undertake this time which finds mention in the terms of reference is the fiscal consolidation roadmap for the states as well as the center. We will hope to create a boost in the progress that we have achieved so far.
We should not forget the importance of what we have achieved in this area. Domestic investor confidence is very important for any economy and macroeconomic stability is very important for the same.
Secondly, I propose that there should be an institutional mechanism for co-operative federalism. We need to find a way to include the states’ view in the fiscal consolidation path. Institutional framework is still not talked about among economists. In this context, I am asking, if we have the institutional instruments to ensure that there can be co-operative federalism in reality. If we don’t have it, then how do we achieve it?
In this vein, I want to bring to attention the institution of Center-State Council as envisaged in the Constitution. We have to find ways to strengthen the Center-State Council.
My third suggestion has to do with the reforms of factors of production, i.e., labour, land and capital. There were some steps taken in the early years of this government but now this has been left to the states. Except a couple of states, most have had a marginal progress in the labour reforms area. Reforms of land, labour and capital are critical to the economic growth and progress. Only then, we will be able to create a prosperous and inclusive India.
(The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of INCLUSION. Comments are welcome at email@example.com)
comments powered by Disqus
RBI under Shaktikanta Das
The Macroeconomic Agenda For the New Government
Spearheading Energy Inclusion and Front-End: Digi-tisation
Electrifying India: Power reaches to every part of the country
Illuminating Andhra Pradesh
Clean Energy for Sustainable Growth
Maheshwari Logistics: Wheels to the Economy
Maharashtra became power surplus state in last two years
Andhra Pradesh's focus is on making power 'smart'
MP cuts Clean Energy Cost through Innovation